On December 20th of 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada unanimously struck down the nation’s anti-prostitution laws which prohibited brothels, public communication between prostitutes and clients, and living on the profits of prostitution.

Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin stated that the court’s judges ruled in favor of striking down these laws because such legislation makes it difficult for prostitutes to properly vet clients and operate in safe environments.

“The prohibitions at issue do not merely impose conditions on how prostitutes operate. They go a critical step further, by imposing dangerous conditions on prostitution; they prevent people engaged in a risky — but legal — activity from taking steps to protect themselves from the risks,” McLachlin wrote in the 2013 decision.

Under the ruling, the Canadian parliament had one year to draft new legislation.

On Wednesday, June 4th, a new prostitution Bill was unveiled. Bill C-36, the Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act, has similarities to the “Nordic model” of sex work legislation, which criminalizes the purchase — but not the sale — of sex. The Bill also includes $20 million in funding to support organizations that help sex workers exit the industry.

“Through this Bill, the Government of Canada has made a strong statement that it views prostitution as harmful to women and vulnerable populations and will crack down on johns and pimps,” writes Joy Smith, a member of the Canadian Parliament, in a recent Huffington Post article.

Smith lists the three primary goals of the legislation, outlined in the preamble:

Protect human dignity and the equality of all Canadians by discouraging prostitution, which has a disproportionate impact on women and children

-Denounce and prohibit the purchase of sexual services because it creates a demand for prostitution

-Encourage those who engage in prostitution to report incidents of violence and to leave prostitution.

Nevada: A Better Prostitution Model

For over forty years, prostitution has been legal in the state of Nevada in the form of licensed brothels, where consenting adults exchange sex for money in discreet, safe, STD-free establishments devoid of pimps and sex trafficking. These businesses are located in Nevada’s rural areas, far from schools, churches, and family oriented neighborhoods.

At the heart of the Nevada prostitution model is the belief that prostitution, an ancient and arguably inevitable aspect of human society, is not fundamentally wrong. Nevada’s government believes that prostitution needs to be regulated, not excoriated.

Sex trafficking, child exploitation, and the violent coercion of unwilling individuals are despicable and reprehensible acts, but the whole picture of prostitution is too often framed by these negative activities. To judge the legal prostitution industry based on illegal prostitution-related crimes is the equivalent of denouncing legal drug companies, which produce anything from pain-relieving aspirin to life-saving insulin, because such companies are in the same general category as heroin traffickers. Just as there is positive, regulated drug use, there can be positive, regulated prostitution, as proven by Nevada’s brothel system. Canada disagrees.

All prostitutes are slaves!

Thecanadian-prostitution Canadian Bill assumes that all prostitutes are working against their will and that the best mode of action for these women is to leave the industry. This broad, fundamentally flawed view of sex workers is not only incorrect; it’s insulting to the millions of women across the globe who have embraced prostitution as an occupational choice.

Despite what the Canadian government would like its citizens to believe, there are large numbers of sex workers in Canada and throughout the world who not only willingly practice prostitution, but who also take pride in their work. Sex workers everywhere deserve legislation that encourages secure, healthy environments where prostitutes can profitably perform their services.

The Nevada model criminalizes what deserves to be criminalized (child prostitution for example), while providing a prosperous situation for women who willfully provide sex services.

Read more: Why assumptions about sex trafficking are harmful

All johns are predators!

Similar to the Nordic model, C-36 attacks customers who seek sexual services from presumably unwilling prostitutes. The idea is that if you scare the clients away with criminal penalties, the demand will go down.

Like the Canadian government’s belief that all prostitutes are victims, the fundamental reasoning for criminalizing buyers is based on the assumption that the vast majority of people who visit prostitutes are violent predators. This couldn’t be further from the truth.

The clientele of Nevada’s brothels are as diverse and varied as Walmart’s customers. A pleasant elderly widower seeking a compassionate encounter to remind him that he is still worthy of an embrace, a handicapped individual in his twenties — escorted by his parents — who wants to discreetly lose his virginity, an adventurous married couple looking for a safe tryst with a third party; these are the “johns” who seek the services of prostitutes.

The Nevada model provides a venue where well-intentioned customers seeking sexual fulfillment will be treated with dignity and respect. The proposed Canadian model assumes that such people deserve no respect.

Prostitution legislation, in every nation, is a complex political issue that provokes strong opinion and heated discussion. Canadian Parliament has a challenging road ahead as it navigates toward a system that works to better all persons who willingly practice sex work, while punishing those that commit violent and coercive crimes against women, children, and men. Worthwhile prostitution legislation begins with the cultivation of an honest, well-informed perspective on “prostitution,” a term that encapsulates a wide variety of experiences, both positive and negative.

This entry was posted in Legal Prostitution. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Canada’s Prostitution Bill

  1. Mandi Love says:

    So if I’m a Canadian working girl the government will help me exit the biz and I’d stop making great money doing what I enjoy? No thanks.

  2. Pingback: Nevada Brothel Weighs In On Canada’s Prostitution Bill | Adult WIkiMedia

  3. Pingback: Nevada Brothel Weighs In On Canada’s Prostitution Bill | The Rob Black Website

  4. Profile photo of Rick Garrett Rick Garrett says:

    Once again, another so-called “democratic” government has blundered into a subject they do not
    understand, and, therefore, righteously attempt to regulate. The differences between a wonderful
    place like Sheri’s and child exploitation; abusive pimps; sadistic customers; etc. is as vast as the distance between the earth and Mars. (Something else, in all these years, NO government has
    managed to deal with sensibly.) Not to bore anyone with a brief story, but I feel it merits telling.
    My big brother John, quite the ladies man before he took sick, had long planned a trip for me
    to a place like Sheri’s. He knew I felt inept and ugly and, though he disagreed, knew this was
    the only way I’d ever know the gentle touch or even the holding of a hand of a girl. The trip
    was going to be just for me, though he’d go to quell my nervousness, until I met the young
    lady, at which time he’d return to the hotel, not because he disapproved…hardly…but because
    he remained faithful to his late wife’s memory his entire life. I lost him five years ago. Finally,
    I found Sheri’s online. (Yes, there are illegal brothels just across the Ohio line from me, but I
    could not bring myself to go where the average girl has been sold from Thailand and barely
    speaks English. And Johnny wouldn’t want me to.) My first contact with Sheri’s by phone
    was AMAZING! Yet, despite the kindness of Dena, Gloria, (and now Racine.) every time I
    was planning to go, I chose attempted suicide instead. This past 4/5, I hit my lowest point and intended to end it the following day. On 4/6 a voice told me to call Sheri’s one more time. My
    Johnny’s voice! My life was saved! Thanks to talking with Gloria and Dena and Racine; thanks
    to emailing someone as compassionate and sweet as Montana, I’m saving for my trip. Not my
    final arrangements. Johnny was no Bible thumping, pious, church goer. But he had his own
    private relationship with God. I believe it was through that relationship that I was able to hear
    Johnny’s voice. The incredible people at Sheri’s have kept me alive. Brought me joy in an
    otherwise joyless life. I’m certain (though still very nervous) that when I walk through their
    door for the very first time next year, they won’t see the ugly, fat, awkward 62 yr. old virgin
    that I am. I’ve been reassured of that more times than I can count! Yet governments continue
    to disparage and misunderstand the vast difference between legalizing prostitution and sidewalk
    exploitation. Perhaps, deeply hidden under their judgmental hypocrisy, they truly don’t care
    about women, in any profession, at all.

  5. Eva M says:

    I think it’s wonderful for the ladies ready to leave the business to have the support and means to transition back to “civilian” life as I call it. I also love the idea of the authorities persecuting those responsible for pandering. There’s nothing worse than abusive men living off of hard working women. The only ones that seem to suffer are the Johns. The good news is they can always come to Sheri’s and enjoy the same if not better experiences where it’s clean, safe and LEGAL!

  6. Winterfun says:

    As a Canadian – yeah the new bill has essentially the same issues as the old one and the politicians are just being cowardly and passing on an opportunity to create meaningful change. But give our Court system it’s due – they realized the old law was broken and dangerous. Maybe it will take time (way more time than it should…) but I think eventually the Canadians will eventually have a meaningful discussion on the topic and when they do will come to a model more like that of Nevada.
    Until then I’ll just have to keep planning my trip to Sheri’s. Will other Canadians be as smart as I? Doubt it unfortunately, but the good thing about this new bill is that it’s a subject that is finally being talked about. Eva is also absolutely correct about the fact support for those who need it is included in the bill.

  7. Pingback: Shaming Johns

  8. Pingback: Shaming Johns

  9. Pingback: Shaming Johns

  10. Pingback: Shaming Johns

  11. Pingback: Shaming Johns

  12. Pingback: Shaming Johns

  13. Pingback: Shaming Johns

  14. Pingback: The New Canada Prostitution Law

Leave a Reply